You are here    News nl sv ru pl es de fr

PlayOnLinux and Linux gaming: Where do we stand in 2014?

Wednesday 13 August 2014 at 13:15

Hi everybody,

After about 8 years of existence, I would like to devote a special article to give my feelings about PlayOnLinux situation, what is its place in Linux Gaming, to explain where we are going and to answer few questions I was asked about PortMyApps.

To put this into context, in 2007, 7th May, we decided with a friend to create PlayOnLinux. The name we had chosen was meaningful: we were hoping to bring a new way to play on Linux. By the time, there were very few native games. The best way we could allow you to play your game on Linux was to use wine. The idea was encouragingly successful because in less than a week, we had more than one hundred members.[1]

At the time, we did not have sufficient resources to provide complete software allowing to use all existing platforms (including native games, which were far fewer in 2007 than today). Therefore, we mainly focused on Windows games (using Wine, DOSBox and ScummVM), and we developed a set of tools allowing to easily install and use these programs.

netappwm.jpgIn 2012, December, Valve announced the release of a Linux version of Steam client[2]. One year later, SteamOS is released[3].  Last month, GOG.Com (Good Old Games) also announce the official support of Linux platform[4]. Such news is encouraging, and show that game publishers have more and more interest in free operating systems, despite the fact that their market share stay low for the moment.[5].

For our part, we obviously want this new trend to continue and we highly encourage game publishers to release their products for Linux. However, our (historical) name PlayOnLinux can now be a little confusing: While you might think we want to bring the way to play on linux, what we are proposing in fact is a tool allowing you to use wine easily. If you are looking for something to manage your game library on Linux, plenty of them exist, such as Lutris[6] which is also a French product.

We are now are facing a new tricky problem: Should we stop encouraging publishers to use wine now that they are showing interest in Linux systems? This problem has been raised in comments from a GamingOnLinux[7] article when I decided to run PortMyApps. (It is important to note that PortMyApps will stay independant of PlayOnLinux, the developers are not the same). We had the idea of getting closer from publishers noticing that PlayOnLinux is becoming harder and harder to maintain, mainly because of its large amount of scripts growing exponentially. Of course, it would not be profitable to see wine being used by game publisher as an easy and low-cost porting solution, to the detriment of a real native developement process. Let me reassure you about this respect, PortMyApps certainly does not want to port the next Elder Scroll, neither to capture Linux video game market. We would not be that pretentious. Furthermore, it is really unlikely to see a publisher at the same time being seriously interested in Linux gaming, and wanting to propose a wine-based solution. It is even more unlikely to see a big game publisher giving such important responsibility to a small project like ours.

However, we figured out that in some cases (two, to be accurate), this idea would be going to be good for everyone.

  • There are some programs whose core business is neither computing, nor video games. I'm thinking about very specific programs, generally used by small amount of people. (Medicine, specialized drawing materials, ...). This software is often used inside a company, or developed in B2B. Publisher and user of this software might want to use Linux without having sufficient resources to port their program. (technological aspects, few developers, ...).
  • There are some very old games whose source code is lost, or whose interest and notability are not sufficient enough regarding the amount of work needed to make a Linux version.

We typically want to work in both of those cases. We have used and followed wine for eight years, and we propose to help, in those cases, to integrate it the best way we can so that the user experience won't be degraded. For information, upload is limited 50Mo.

To come back to PlayOnLinux, we are obvisouly aware that one day, it will become pointless and will have no longer reasons to exists. We strongly believe that it would represent a victory for the values we are defending. However, we also think that everybody should be able to run software he wants regardless the choice of the operating system. It is in this mind that we will continue to do what we have been doing for nearly eight years, until each publisher decides to release a native (and not wine based) version of each game. We still have a long way to go and a lot of ideas to present you. I also would like to thank each of those that has been involved in this project for the last seven years.

Feel free to post questions in comments, I will be glade to answer the best I can.





Quentin PÂRIS


Author Replies
HardPenguin Thursday 14 August 2014 at 7:57

Thank you, Quentin for starting the project and maintaining it for many years already. It still is very useful and it will always be useful.

kanito8a Thursday 14 August 2014 at 11:40

I want to say the same thing as HardPenguin: THANK YOU. 

POL its a great project and I think its now more vaulable than ever. There is a lot of people coming to Linux that want to play games, and all of us need a easy way to run old games, and those games that are difficult to install on Wine, and POL is the best at that.

Quentin PÂRIS Thursday 14 August 2014 at 12:47


Thank you :)

Xodetaetl Friday 15 August 2014 at 15:10


Your comment system doesn t escape single quotes. Got a mysql error and lost my message.

Quentin PÂRIS Friday 15 August 2014 at 15:54



Very sorry, it was parsed, but another bug coming from the html cleaner unescaped the strings.

It is now fixed, you can repost your comment if you want. Hope it was not too long :-/
oldrocker99 Monday 18 August 2014 at 16:55

I have paid for CrossOver, but POL simply works better. I tried using CrossOver to install Steam Skyrim, and it would not run. I tried again, using the POL script, and it worked perfectly. Once, when I was installing some GOG game (I forgot the title) the POL script crashed. I reported it, and the script was fixed The. Next. Day. For a free program. It doesn't get any better than that.

These are a couple of the many reasons I still use POL. It is one polished, incredibly useful piece of tool, and, when I can, I'll donate. I regard POL that highly.

Daniel Wednesday 10 December 2014 at 15:03

Just Thank You!

Daniel Fourie Friday 12 December 2014 at 12:38

Thank you! Thank you guys! Im so happy i read this :)
JohnnyCash12 Thursday 26 October 2017 at 9:46


I just found out about PlayOnMac and thought I would give it a try... What a complete waste of time. Get it together or give up.

run 3

annashetty Wednesday 6 December 2017 at 3:52


You have a decent point here!I absolutely concur with what you have said!!Thanks for sharing your views...hope more individuals will read this article

photoshop alternative, cool math games run 3


Post a comment


You must be logged in to post a comment